06 June 2015

WRTG 3030: Writing on Science Society

This blog contains all the course content for Joshua Ware's course WRTG 3030: Writing on Science and Society for the Program of Writing and Rhetoric at University of Colorado-Boulder during the Fall 2014 and Spring 2015 semesters.

As the course syllabus states:
WRTG 3030 explores the intersection of science and society as it pertains to composition. To this end, we will examine--both through writing and discussion--the manner in which science and society interact with one another. How do these concepts or entities, broadly speaking, inform one another? Conversely, how do they react or challenge one another? When answering these questions, we will want to pay attention both to the instances wherein science and society echo, overlap, or affirm each other, as well as those instances in which they seem to contradict, undercut, or negate one another. Through these investigations, it is my hope that we will be able to come to a realization of the complex relationship between the two through critical thought and an array of writing processes, practices, and projects. 
In order to accomplish these goals, we will compose a variety of documents and texts, employing multimodal strategies that demonstrate a sensitivity to genre and, therefore, context. A practical definition of multimodal is any visual element used to supplement a text in some purposeful way; examples of supplemental elements are audio, video, photographs, drawings, etc. To further clarify the first sentence of this paragraph, Knowing Words, the Program of Writing and Rhetoric's official guide book to First-Year Writing courses, defines genre as the manner in which we "group texts by their characteristics" and name them; as such, genre is "a category" of texts that have "structures that are instantly recognizable" and "tell the audience what is coming." Finally, much of our writing and revision (and all of our discussions) will be collaborative in nature, highlighting the communal nature of of both science and society. 
Please explore this website for more information.

18 May 2015

UPDATE: 18 MAY 2015

For the final projects of all three sections of WRTG 3030: Writing on Science and Society (Spring 2015), students formed into small group in order to create video-essays in the style of TEDTalks. Embedded in this post are each groups' final version of their projects. More information regarding each video can be found on the individual YouTube pages:


SECTION 10:


What Happens When the Government Funds Controversies



The Next Giant Leap



Tripping Through Time



Fracking and Water Contamination



Whose Water Is It Anyway?



The Echoes of Apollo




SECTION 13:


How Quantum Computers will Change the World



3D Prothetics



Music, Anticipation, and Preference



From Wooden Peg Legs to Robotic Monkeys



Privacy in the Techonolgy Era



Gene Doping




SECTION 15:


Sport Concussions: The Underlying Dangers of Competition



Asteroid Mining



Why You're [Also] Probably Not Doing Enough About Internet Security



Nanotechnology in Environmental Cleanup



Smart Prosthetics and the Future of Brain-Computer Interfaces



HIV and Personalized Gene Therapies: The Future of Medicine



27 April 2015

UPDATE: 27 APR 201

UPLOADED SCHEDULE /  GUIDELINES:

To alleviate log jams and security issues related to simultaneous uploads for our course YouTube channel, I'm creating an upload schedule for all three sections of WRTG 3030. Each group will be given a two hour window. If you have not completed your upload by the end of your slot, you will need to discontinue the process in order for the next group to proceed. In other words, do NOT wait until the last half hour of your allotted time frame to begin the process.  The schedule is as follows:
Tuesday, 05 May
10:00am - 12:00pm: Alex, Chris, Shannon
12:00pm - 2:00pm: Adian, Victoria, Wyatt 
2:00pm - 4:00pm: Beckett, Ryan, Shalini
4:00pm - 6:00pm: Andrea, Kevin, Peyman
Wednesday, 06 May
8:00am - 10:00am: Austin, Brendan, Chrissy J, Nate Dogg
10:00am - 12:00pm: Ben, Dominic, Thomas
12:00pm - 2:00pm: Devon, Katherine, Owen
2:00pm - 4:00pm: Christina, Olivia, Veronica
4:00pm - 6:00pm: James, Kayla, Marta 
:00pm - 8:00pm: Charlie, Grant, Nina
8:00pm - 10:00pm: Daniel, Jennifer, Michelle
Thursday, 07 May
8:00am - 10:00am: Dobis P.R., Forrest, Odom 
10:00am - 12:00pm: Alec, Jared, Jason, Jeremy 
12:00pm - 2:00pm: Andrew, Craig, Sam
2:00pm - 4:00pm: Clayton, Daniel, Joshua 
4:00pm - 6:00pm: Conner, Emma, Thuy
6:00pm - 8:00pm: Alex, Becky, Christian, Jack 
8:00pm - 10:00pm: Casey, Taggert, Zeyu
I based the above schedule upon the order in which we critiqued your rough drafts. To this end, those of you whose videos we commented on last will have a little bit more time to work your the final versions.

With regard to your upload, the title of the video should be the title of your presentation. Additionally, I would like you to include the following information in the information section:
WRTG 3030: Writing on Science and Society (Joshua Ware)
Section [insert section number here]

University of Colorado-Boulder

Spring Semester 2015
Title of Presentation
Group Members Names with project duties
Please be fair and honest with your assessments of "project duties." If a particular group member did not contribute to the script, for example, do not list him/her as a script writer. Possible position titles include: script writer, videographer, project manager, site coordinator, video editor, and presenter. Obviously, there could be other duties; moreover, multiple people could have attended to a particular task. For instance, if there were two video editors, please list their description as co-video editor.

TEDTalk VIDEO ESSAY PROJECT "RUBRIC":

I would like you to ask yourself the following questions while completing your final drafts:

Does the video open with a TEDTalk-like splash screen? Does the opening shot after the splash screen have the presenter's name and the presentation's title in the bottom right-hand corner?

Is the argument clear and concise? Does the argument follow a comprehensible and logical pattern? To this end, is the introduction relevant and engaging? Does it clearly outline the purpose of the presentation? Does the body support the argument? Does it contain relevant examples? Are the examples illustrative and concrete? Does the conclusion answer the "so what" question? Does the conclusion end the presentation on a compelling note?

Does the video employ close-up, mid-range, and wide-range shots? Are these different perspectives used appropriately?

Does the video employ different angles (i.e. upward, downward, and eye-level)? If so, are these different angles used appropriately?

Does the video employ pans and zooms? If so, are these techniques used with a rhetorical purpose and technically proficient?

Are the shots/cuts of the speaker 7-12 seconds in length? Are quick cuts employed? Are they smooth, in that they work with a) the rhetorical turns of the argument, b) the cadence and rhythm of the speaker's voice, c) retain continuity of the speaker's body position in space, and d) do not contain "black space"?

Are complex concepts or data visualized with cutaways? Are the cutaways held for long enough so the audience can understand the data or image? If the cutaways are stock photographs or videos, are they clear and comprehensible? Are they relevant and necessary? Is there, roughly speaking, one-cutaway-per-minute? If so, are the cutaways appropriately spaced throughout the presentation?

Does the speaker remain cognizant of their place in space? To this end, does the speaker remain relatively stationary, moving, primarily, in relationship to the rhetorical turns in the argument? Does the speaker use their hands appropriately, using them to highlight their argumentation or point? Otherwise, do they keep them above their waist? Is the speaker appropriately dressed? Does the speaker appear enthusiastic and engaged? Does the speaker have (or appear to have) the presentation memorized?

Is the lighting of an acceptable quality? Is the sound of an acceptable quality? Does the location appear professional?

Does the presentation conclude with credits?

SCRIPT GUIDELINES:

The script for your TEDTalk video essay should be typed, single-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font. You should use standard, one-inch margins.

In the top, right-hand corner, list all of your group members and the section number of your course. This header should be followed by a blank space, then a centered title (don't underline or place in boldface).

For the script proper, please use the paragraph form; each paragraph should correspond to a cut in the video. The one caveat to this format is for cutaways: if the speaker continues to talk over a cutaway, just place the words [cutaway] within the text to indicate this strategy.

Finally, you will need to conclude your script with a properly formatted works cited page.

Scripts should be emailed to me by Tuesday, 05 May at 10am. The documents should be attached to the email as a .doc or .docx file.

02 April 2015

UPDATE: 02 APR 2014

Yesterday, after speaking with each section regarding your progress on the TEDTalk-style video-essays, I've decided to cut the NPR RadioLab audio-essay. As such, your video project will be the last assignment of the semester. I would much rather have you complete one project in a coherent, professional manner, than attempt to complete two projects in a less than rigorous fashion.

In order to accommodate this development, I've altered the schedule as follows:
Friday, 03 April: Presentation by Tim Riggs of the Academic Media Resources 
Monday, 06 April: Recording of TEDTalk video-essays
Wednesday, 08 April: Recording of TedTalk video-essays
Friday, 10 April: Recording of TEDTalk video-essays 
Monday, 13 April: Editing of TEDTalk video-essays
Wednesday, 15 April: Editing of TEDTalk video-essays
Friday, 17 April: Editing of TEDTalk video-essays 
Monday, 20 April: Presentation and Critique of "Rough Drafts"
Wednesday, 22 April: Presentation and Critique of "Rough Drafts"
Friday, 24 April: Presentation and Critique of "Rough Drafts" 
Monday, 27 April: Questions, problems, issues regarding revising/editing
Wednesday, 29 April: Evaluations
Friday, 01 May: TEDTalk video-essays due
Since next week and the following week will be designated "Recording" and "Editing" weeks, respectively, that means our classrooms will be open during our sessions. To this end, groups can "reserve" our classrooms (through me) for recording-location purposes. I would request that you only reserve the room on a specific date if your are fully prepared to record (i.e. you have a complete script and you've practiced your material a few times). Also, remember that you'll only have the room for one hour. In other words, be ready to begin recording immediately.

During these two weeks, please feel free to email me if you have any questions specific to your group. If they cannot be answered via email, then we can schedule a meeting to discuss your issues and concerns.

Finally, as I mentioned to several of you yesterday, make sure that you create an interesting and entertaining introduction that captures your audience's attention (do not open your video with bland statistics and complex jargon); likewise, have clearly articulated transitional statements that a) highlight the purpose of your "talk," and b) signal the movement from one section of your video to the next.

20 March 2015

UPDATE: 20 MAR 2014

First, I would like to announce that the due date for the TEDTalk video-essay will be pushed back; instead of turning in the assignment on Monday 06 April, the assignment will now be due on Monday 13 April.

I will also move the due date of the RadioLab-style audio-essay; instead of a Friday, 01 May due date, you will turn the assignment in to me on Wednesday, 06 May.

As for the TedTalk, you will be expected to create a 7-9 minute video that concentrates on a specific sub-topic related to your umbrella topic/issue. In addition to delivering to me a video file, I would also like a typed hard-copy of your script (double-space, 12-point Times New Roman font).

You should organize your TedTalk video-essay in a comprehensible manner, employing a rhetorical framework that clearly conveys your message with discernible talking points and smooth transitions. To this end, think about the way in which concrete examples, narratives, and diagrams/images serve to highlight your material. Likewise, consider how editing, cuts, angles, and other technical aspects serve to enhance your language and offer compelling visual stimuli. Finally, consider how the presenter's body language (e.g. posture and hand movements), appearance, and vocals (e.g. cadence, rhythm, and intonation) affect the viewer's understanding and acceptance of the message.

12 March 2015

UPDATE: 12 MAR 2014


Since we will not be meeting in class for our Friday session, I would like each of you to watch the assigned TEDTalks (see below) and create two detailed outlines. We will discuss these outlines next week.

The first outline will focus on the rhetorical framework of the TEDTalk. I want you to plot (with time-stamps) the movements of the speaker's argument. Please be as granular as possible when delineating the presentation. By this, I mean, I expect you provide specific information on a minute-to-minute (if not second-to-second) basis. I do not want you to simply write: Intro, Body, Conclusion.

The second outline will focus on editing techniques. Specifically, I want you to document every single cut in the video with time-stamps and the type of shot. Here are some terms that will help you when creating this second outline.

Close-up: a very close look at the subject. Establishes tension or mystery. Also called a “tight” or “detail” shot. 
Mid-range shot: the most common shot, the mid-range shot shows interaction between characters. 
Long shot: also “establishing shot.” Sets the scene, establishes context, sets the mood. 
Camera angle: high, low, and level. Establishes point-of-view. Looking up at or down onto your subject carries huge meaning and can give a scene greater depth. 
Frame: this term has two meanings: First it’s a single still image that describes the smallest unit of a motion picture. Or second, it’s the way in which the content is laid out in the camera’s field of view. In this context the second definition applies. 
Tilt: the camera tilts up and down. 
Pan: the camera moves from side to side. Done slowly, this is a great way to set a scene and involve the viewer. 
Zoom: the camera zooms into or out of a scene. The speed of the zoom has a major effect on the feel of the scene. 
Move: moving across or zooming on a still image. Also known as the “Ken Burns” effect. 
Tracking shot: the camera follows its target. 
Dolly shot: also “crane shot,” “arc shot,” etc. The camera physically moves in relation to the subject, quite often on some type of mechanical conveyance.

Section 10, please watch the following video:


Section 13, please watch the following video:


Section 15, please watched the follwing video:



06 March 2015

UPDATE: 06 MAR 2014

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:

In order to transition effectively from your proposal to your TEDTalk and RadioLab Podcast, your small group will need to conduct academic research. To document this process, you’ll need to create an annotated bibliography.

An annotated bibliography consists of a list of MLA-style citations for books, articles, websites, etc. Each citation is followed by a paragraph-long description and evaluation of the source.

Before you begin writing your annotated bibliography, you will need to narrow down your research topic. A good annotated bibliography includes only those sources that directly relate to your narrowed, focused research question. To this extent, you want to ask yourself: What specific questions do I have about my topic that I would like to answer through research? Any one of those questions would likely be a suitable research topic.

Once you have decided on a focused research question, you may begin collecting sources for your annotated bibliography. The bibliography itself will consist of 12 secondary sources (16 for groups of four students), which are listed below by type (along with the rules to follow). I’ve listed acceptable sources below:

Books: this includes anthologies, but not books printed solely on the Internet (i.e. if the book is online, it must have appeared in print first).

Essays/Articles: from journals, magazines or newspapers: You should find these in databases, and if there is a link to full text, that’s okay. Otherwise, use Inter-Library Loan or get them out at our library.

As mentioned previously, each source in an annotated bibliography requires the following material:

First, describe or summarize the main points made in the book, article, on the webpage, etc. You should discuss the central theme of the source, the thesis, major sub-points, salient examples, and the audience it is trying to reach (if possible), etc. To this end, I’d like to see you articulate the book or essay’s thesis, as well as outlining the sources main points. Please include relevant quotes when possible.

Second, you will need to evaluate the source. Your evaluation should include why the source and the author are credible, how the source is relevant to your narrowed research question, and how you evaluate the source. I’m looking for specific citations/ideas from your sources and how those citation/ideas connect directly to your upcoming projects. Do not create vague or overly generalized relationships that do not demonstrate an understanding of the text and why you’ve chosen it.

This aspect of your assignment should be 11-14 pages in length (15-17 pages for groups of four), double-spaced and typed in 12-point, Times New Roman font. Do not include sources that you included in your Research Proposal.

Each of the sources must be formatted to MLA specifications.

For more information on, please consult OWL’s guidelines for the Annotated Bibliography.

04 March 2015

UPDATE: 04 MAR 2014

Just as a reminder, hard-copies of your Research Proposals will be due at the beginning of our class session on Friday, 06 March (we will meet in your regular classroom). Please make sure that all of your names are listed on the document and that it is stapled. The Proposal should be typed in 12-point, Times New Roman font with one-inch margins and double-spaced. Refer to the project guidelines for all the other details.

25 February 2015

UPDATE: 25 FEB 2014

I've listed the conference schedule for each section below. Please show up 5 minutes before your time slot so as to ensure that we can begin our meetings on time. Be prepared to speak at length and in detail about your umbrella topic, possible subtopics, and the progress you've made on your Research Proposals. All meetings will be held in my office, which is located in the basement of the Environmental Design Building.

Friday, 27 February:
12:00: Alex, Chris, Shannon
12:25: Devon, Katherine, Owen 
1:00: Andrea, Kevin, Peyman
1:25: Clayton, Daniel, Joshua 
2:00: Daniel, Jennifer, Michelle
2:25: Dobis P.R., Forrest, Odom 
Monday, 02 March:
12:00: Christina, Olivia, Veronica
12:25: Adian, Victoria, Wyatt 
1:00: Beckett, Ryan, Shalini
1:25: Charlie, Grant, Nina 
2:00: Austin, Brendan, Chrissy J, Nathan
2:25: ALex, Becky, Christian, Jack 
Wednesday, 04 March:
12:00: Andrew, Craig, Sam
12:25: Alec, Jared, Jason, Jeremy 
1:00: Conner, Emma, Thuy
1:25: James, Kayla, Marta 
2:00: Casey, Taggert, Zeyu
2:25: Ben, Dominic, Thomas

20 February 2015

UPDATE: 20 FEB 2014

For the remainder of the semester, you will conduct research and complete projects in small groups. They are as follows:
SECTION 10
Group 1: Christina, Roni, Olivia
Group 2: Katherine, Owen, Devon
Group 3: Sam, Andrew, Craig
Group 4: Tori, Aidan Wyatt
Group 5: Jeremy, Jason, Jared, Alec
Group 6: Chris, Alex, Shannon 
SECTION 13
Group 1: Emma, Connor, Thuy
Group 2: James, Marta, Kayla
Group 3: Clayton, Joshua, Daniel
Group 4: Beckett, Shalini, Ryan
Group 5: Kevin, Peyman, Andrea
Group 6: Charlie, Nina, Grant
SECTION 15
Group 1: Austin, Nathan, Chris, Brendan
Group 2: Odom, Forrest, Dobis
Group 3: Becky, Christian, Alex, Jack
Group 4: Jennifer, Michelle, Daniel
Group 5: Zeyu, Casey, Taggert
Group 6: Dominic, Ben, Thomas
During your first meeting, please spend some time getting to know one another better through conversation, etc. But I would also like you to engage in serious discussions about possibly "umbrella" topics, create a rough sketch of your time line, and exchange contact information.

If, for some reason, you have a "serious" issue with the research group in which you have been placed, please email me this weekend with a clearly articulated grievance. If someone in another group expresses a similar desire to exit their pairing, I will consider swapping your places.

18 February 2015

UPDATE: 18 FEB 2014

In order to create research groups, I'll need each one of you to send me an email before 3pm, tomorrow afternoon. Please follow the below directions/formatting:

The subject line of your email should be [Section Number]: Group Request; so, for example, if you're enrolled in my 12:00pm course, your subject line would read "10: Group Request."

The first paragraph of your email should begin with the name of your first requested peer, proceeded by a detailed and specific explanation of why you would like to work with student. You should derive this information directly from the presentation they delivered.

The second paragraph of your email should begin with the name of your second requested peer. The content of the paragraph should adhere to the same format as the previous paragraph.

Finally, your third paragraph should begin with the tag "Alternates:" followed by a list of four of your peers. You do not need detailed explanations or justifications for why you would like to work with your alternate choices.

I will create groups based upon a) the detail and rhetorical veracity of your explanations, b) common/joint requests, and, as a final deciding factor, c) on a first-come, first-serve basis.

Remember, you will work in/with these research groups for the remainder of the semester, so be sure to request students who have similar interests, complimentary skill sets, a solid work ethic, and compatible personalities.

11 February 2015

UPDATE: 11 FEB 2015

Your next major writing assignment is the Research Proposal; it will be worth 15 points.

Your proposal will be composed collaboratively with your group members. During the course of the next few weeks, then, you will meet with your team members, decide upon a topic, and conduct your initial research. Below are the general guidelines for the Research Proposal:

RESEARCH PROPOSAL GUIDELINES

PURPOSE:

The research proposal is designed to orient you to your research focus by asking you to articulate a topic for investigation; it also introduces you to the genre of proposal writing and establishes the relationship between sophisticated use of sources and strong research writing. As Alfano and O'Brien state in their textbook Envision: Persuasive Writing in a Visual World, the research proposal “provides a…formal structure for developing a project” and acts as a “means of organizing your thoughts in order to help you solidify your topic and move into the next stages of research” (113). In order to aid you in the proper construction of such a "formal structure," I've provided you with the below details.

SUBJECT:

While the topic you select for this semester will be related to "Science and Society," the specific trajectory of your project is up to your group to determine collaboratively. Ultimately, though, choose a topic that interests or appeals to you in some way.

WHAT IS A RESEARCH PROPOSAL:

The foundation of research and writing is discovery, so you should not worry about whether or not your proposal will address exactly what you end up writing about in your subsequent projects; rather, choose an "umbrella" topic that will be broad enough for your group to explore and write about in various permutations over the course of the entire semester.

The proposal, though, is a type of promise (to yourself, your peers, and your instructor) that will guide you through the research process and the development of a research-based argument. In all likelihood, as you conduct your research, your topic will modify in some way. This is perfectly acceptable and, in fact, normal.

A wide variety of disciplines and professions use proposals as a means of developing agendas for research communities, securing funding for studies, publicizing plans for inquiry and field research, and testing the interest of potential audience in a given project. Therefore, the genre, organization, and contents of the research proposal differ in many important ways from other kinds of popular and academic writing (which will be discussed in the “Content and Process” section). In the proposal, you need to explain your interest in your chosen subject and establish a set of questions to guide your inquiry. You also need to create a timeline for your research and writing process, as it is crucial to time management and helping to shape the scope and range of your research.

FORMAT AND LENGTH:

This assignment asks you to try out real-world standards for the length, format, and content of a research proposal, which will prepare you for future academic and professional projects. Your research proposal will be a 15-page document that outlines your research ideas. The proposal should be double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, spell-checked and proofread. As this is both a formal project and a graded assignment, make sure that your proposal is more polished than a stream-of-consciousness free-write.

CONTENT AND PROCESS:

1. First, come up with an intriguing title for your research proposal that articulates a spirit of inquiry and engages your audience’s (i.e. your peers and professors) interest.

2. An introduction that clearly states and describes your topic, outlines your purpose, and identifies the conversation you have entered. You should develop a working thesis; this tentative statement will help you navigate sources more effectively and assist with time management and navigation of resources. But remember: be prepared to change your thesis as often as an honest interpretation of the data demands.

3. Provide background on your topic and what you know so far. Acknowledging how little you know can be an effective rhetorical move, for it demonstrates your need to conduct research. Of course, you should conduct preliminary research that you will incorporate and properly site in this section. Therefore, please integrate 3-4 reputable and relevant sources in your research proposal.

4. Identify a series of research questions that will inform your project and explain them in your proposal. While you, no doubt, will pose some general questions, make sure that you develop a series of specific and relevant(thus helpful) questions in order to guide and focus your next stage of research.

5. Outline your methods of research. What library tools and facilities will you use? What primary and secondary sources do you have in mind? Will you conduct interviews with experts on campus or in the community? What about field research with various communities or populations involve with your subject matter? Be as specific as possible, providing the names of key sources, potential interviewees, and your rationale for why these methods will serve your needs. For example, don’t just write “I will use the library databases”; instead, state what databases you plan to use and list some possible Boolean searches you will conduct. Identifying sources you found helpful during the initial stages of your research and explain why you found them useful. List some possible experts that you think would be amenable to interviews.

6. Set up a time line for your research. You can use the syllabus to help you in this endeavor; be sure to identify the steps of the process. This aspect is the one common denominator in all research proposals, no matter what the disciplinary or professional field. Again, though, be as specific as possible: you will need to do more than simply copy-and-paste assignment deadlines; what research activities will you engage in on a weekly basis?

7. Determine and articulate the purpose or goal of this research: Why are you researching this particular topic? Why do you feel compelled to study this topic further? Whom do you hope to persuade? What is the significance of this work? This last aspect is the most crucial one, and it often makes or breaks the decision of a governing board, financial establishment, or other evaluative audience when judging various proposals of their merit, feasibility, and contribution to the field. You might decide to use this aspect for your conclusion.

8. Create a working bibliography that lists sources you have collected so far. Your working bibliography should conform to the documentation system (MLA) specified by your instructor, supervisor, or funding agency.

05 February 2015

05 FEB 2014

During the second half of our Friday session and all of our Monday session, we will peer-review our cover letters. Please adhere to the following process when so doing:

COVER LETTER PEER-REVIEW:

During today's class session, we will workshop our cover letters. As with our resume workshop, this will be a multi-step process.

First, pair up with one of your fellow students. Do not pair up with someone who reviewed your resume; I would like everyone to interact with (and get as many opinions from) as many students as possible during the course of the semester.

After you've selected a partner, exchange the job posting to which you're "applying." Read each others posting, then comment, in detail, on elements or characteristics that you think would be beneficial to mention in a cover letter. Be thorough and honest about your assessment.

Once you've commented on the job posting, look over your peer's resume (since we're turning in hard-copies today, everyone should have one). What aspects of your peer's profile stand out to you? What parts of the resume, to your mind, should be highlighted, re-worded, or expanded upon? Moreover, given the job ad you just finished reading and commenting on, how could a cover letter function as a bridge between the posting and the resume? Likewise, if something is missing or problematic (with regard to the posting and resume's relationship), how could a cover letter address these issues. Again, be detailed and specific in your response.

Once you've commented on both the job ad and the resume, read your peer's cover letter straight through without commenting. After you've read it, what are your initial impressions of the document? Write them out in a detailed and thorough manner.

After documenting your initial impressions of the cover letter, I want you to answer the following questions as they relate to your peer's document. Remember your partner will need to revise his/her cover letter based upon your feedback (and turn in your notes with their final draft), so be specific, expansive, constructive, and intelligible in your answers; also, be sure to write clearly.

Who is the audience for the cover letter? Is it a large company, a small private firm, an academic institution, or a nonprofit organization? What difference would it make and how would that be reflected in the cover letter? Does the cover letter you're reading attend to this consideration of audience properly? How could your peer better address their audience? Has the writer "translated" their discourse jargon and responsibilities into a idiom that the audience will comprehend? If so, how could they do this better; if not, make detailed suggestions on improving this aspect of the letter.

Does does your partner clearly and concisely state their objective? If so, how; if not, how could they do so in a clear and concise manner? Even if they have, offer a suggestion for how they could state their objective better.

Based upon your understanding of the job posting (and a company's interests, generally speaking), what do you think the objectives (there will be more than one) of the company would be? How are your partners objectives similar and different? How can those similarities be more clearly highlighted; likewise, how can those differences be better explained or masked?

Does your partner's cover letter clearly address the benefits they would provide to the company or organization? How so? Offer alternative suggestions for how he/she could do so in a better or more persuasive manner. If they haven't mentioned the benefits of their potential hiring, use their resume and the job posting to create some options for them.

What specific evidence does your partner provide to demonstrate their potential benefit to the company? How can this evidence be re-formatted to improve the letter? If they haven't, again, use their resume and the job posting to make some suggestions.

Generally speaking, does the cover letter accomplish the following tasks: Show the employer he/she has tailored the letter to the company and to the job they want? Explain his/her experiences in a clear, story-like format that works with the information in your resume? Explain in detail his/her experiences and skills that relate to the job you want? Explain in detail how his/her experiences and skills will help the employer and fulfill the job requirement? Provide an example of his/her communication skills?

Does the cover letter, at some point, develop a personal connection between the writer and the company, organization, or institution to which they're applying? How so? Is it appropriate, given the position for which he/she is applying? If not, how can that portion of the cover letter be altered? If they haven't, provide a series of suggestions that might work within the context of the cover letter.

Does the cover letter contain all of the following sections, and are the properly formatted: heading, introduction, argument/body paragraphs  (two paragraphs, in this section, is usually considered appropriate), and closing. For a list of elements that each of these section should contain, please visit  the following page at Purdue's OWL and scroll down to the bottom of the page.

30 January 2015

UPDATE: 30 JAN 2014

For our class session on Monday, 02 February, please bring a rough draft of your cover letter to class. When drafting your letter, please consider the articles we read, as well as our classroom discussion from Friday. Likewise, make sure you compose your cover letter for the job posting for which you created your resume.

We will workshop a cover letter in class on Monday, then peer-review our letters on Wednesday.

28 January 2015

UPDATE: 28 JAN 2014

COVER LETTER READINGS:

The second portion of our current project cycle will necessitate that you write a cover letter for the same job posting for which you created a resume. To this end, read the following websites and articles that provide guidance and tips for composing this document:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/34/42/
http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/CoverLetters.html
http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2011/03/24/how-to-write-a-cover-letter/
http://jobsearch.about.com/od/coverletters/a/aa030401a.htm
http://www.wikihow.com/Write-a-Cover-Letter
While reading these sites and articles, consider how the information therein would apply to the cover letter that you will be writing for this course. Be prepared to write about and discuss in class what you've read.

RESUME PEER-REVIEW:

Today, you respond critically to your peers' resumes in today's class session. By "critically," I mean offering constructive feedback so they can improve their document. Simply writing "Good work," or "I wouldn't change anything," or "Everything looks in order" will not suffice.

As such, I want you to think about the manner in which the resume responds to the job posting:

Is the form and style of the resume easy to read? Give the resume a 20-second test; meaning, look at the resume for 20 seconds and jot down whatever you can remember from the cursory glance. What facts and elements do you remember? Are these the facts/elements that are most relevant to the position? If not, how can the resume be re-ordered or re-formatted so that it foregrounds the most important aspects of the job posting? Does the resume pass the "four quadrant" test? Again, if it does not, how can it be re-formatted so that it does?

Does the resume employ diction (word choice) of the job posting? Does the content of the resume use "action words"? Does the content demonstrate "results-based" descriptions? Does the content forefront the skills and qualifications that the job posting lists first? Even if you think the resume you're reading does accomplish these goals, offer alternative suggestions so your peer has several ideas or variations from which to choose.

What format has your peer employed: chronological, functional, or combination? How could you re-format the resume, generally speaking, so it addresses the job posting more effectively?

Does the resume contain all the necessary components: Name, contact information, skills, experience, and education? If the resume contains references, relevant coursework, or a belief/objective/summary statement, how are these elements incorporated into the fabric of the text? How could they be improved or re-ordered?

Lastly, is the resume clear of typos, misspellings, and other careless errors? If the resume you're looking at contains hyperlinks or other multimedia elements, do the links, etc. function properly?

Make sure to write down all your feedback, as part of the requirement for this assignment will be that your peer must turn in all the comments made by fellow students.

27 January 2015

UPDATE: 27 JAN 2014

For Wednesday's class session, please bring a completed rough draft of your resume with you. We will continue peer-reviewing you documents.

I am moving the due date for the resume's final draft delivery from Wednesday, 28 January to Friday, 30 January.

24 January 2015

UPDATE: 24 JAN 2014

We will continue to workshop the student example of an "Experience" entry at the beginning of Monday's class session. Once we conclude the class-wide critique, I want you to conduct another peer-review of a peer's resume, focusing, specifically, on their "Experience" sections. Employ the same critical techniques on your peer's resume.

To this end, you'll need a complete rough draft of your resume. When doing so, it's a best practice not to separate paid positions (i.e. "Employment") from unpaid positions (i.e. "Volunteer" or "Service"). Grouping all your work-related activities under the general category of "Experience" will provide you, rhetorically, with a stronger document.

22 January 2015

UPDATE: 22 JAN 2014

For tomorrow's class session, please bring a draft of one "Experience" entry (i.e. a job, internship, or volunteer position) for your resume.

When drafting the entry, make sure you to include the company, organization, or institution's name, it's location, the dates of your employment/service, and your position title.

When describing you duties and responsibilities, make sure you lead each bullet-pointed item with an strong "action word," followed by a specific duty that resulted in a particular outcome. As you compose these items, try to incorporate language from the job description and focus on the duties you performed that relate to the employer's job posting.

We will workshop and peer-review these entries during our class session.

17 January 2015

UPDATE: 17 JAN 2014

For this coming week, I want you to read the following websites that deal with resume writing:
(Click through all the relevant links on this main page) 
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Resume
After you read through these pages/sites, begin thinking about how you can create the best resume for your field, as well as a particular position. While you may be able to consider your field requirements generically, I want you to find a specific job posting to tailor your resume toward. To this end, find an opening for an internship or entry-level position that you could feasibly apply to in the near future. Jot down some notes and ideas (with the reading we've done and the job you've selected in mind) that would aid in the drafting of your resume. Bring a hard-copy of this job opening to class on Wednesday; likewise, make sure to download, copy-and-paste, or take a screen shot of the opening. Most of these ads will disappear once the position is filled, and you'll need to have recourse to it over the course of the next few weeks.

07 January 2015

SYLLABUS

WRTG 3030: WRITING ON SCIENCE AND SOCIETY


Section: 010, Day/Time: MWF / 12:00 PM - 12:50 PM, Room: STAD 112
Section: 013, Day/Time: MWF / 01:00 PM - 1:50 PM, Room: RAMY N1B31
Section: 015, Day/Time: MWF / 02:00 PM - 2:50 PM, Room: ECON 16

Instructor: Joshua Ware, Ph.D.
Email: joshua.ware@colorado.edu
Office: 1B30-B, Environmental Design
Office Phone: 303-735-4673
Office Hours: MW, 10:00am-11:45am


COURSE OVERVIEW:

For all three sections of WRTG 3030, we will explore the intersection of science and society as it pertains to composition. To this end, we will examine--both through writing and discussion--the manner in which science and society interact with one another. How do these concepts or entities, broadly speaking, inform one another? Conversely, how do they react or challenge one another? When answering these questions, we will want to pay attention both to the instances wherein science and society echo, overlap, or affirm each other, as well as those instances in which they seem to contradict, undercut, or negate one another. Through these investigations, it is my hope that we will be able to come to a realization of the complex relationship between the two through critical thought and an array of writing processes, practices, and projects.

In order to accomplish these goals, we will compose a variety of documents and texts, employing multimodal strategies that demonstrate a sensitivity to genre and, therefore, context. A practical definition of multimodal is any visual element used to supplement a text in some purposeful way; examples of supplemental elements are audio, video, photographs, drawings, etc. To further clarify the first sentence of this paragraph, Knowing Words, the Program of Writing and Rhetoric's official guide book to First-Year Writing courses, defines genre as the manner in which we "group texts by their characteristics" and name them; as such, genre is "a category" of texts that have "structures that are instantly recognizable" and "tell the audience what is coming." Finally, much of our writing and revision (and all of our discussions) will be collaborative in nature, highlighting the communal nature of of both science and society.



COURSE INFORMATION

Texts and Materials:

While we will not be using a specific textbook for this course, there will be a substantial amount of reading that occurs throughout the semester. The articles you'll read will be either PDF files that I'll upload to Google Drive/Docs or found online. To this end, you will need a device that enables you to access material online and a Google Docs account (affiliated with your CU-Boulder email address). On days that we discuss these articles, you must have a copy with you during our class; whether that copy be digital or paper-based, does not matter. But, if you don't have a laptop or tablet, etc., you must print a copy out for class. Likewise, we will engage in freewriting and other invention exercises in class. Therefore, please purchase a composition notebook of some sort so that you have a dedicated space to archive all your writing. Alternatively, you can, again, type these assignments on a digital device.

Assignments:

For this course, you will have five major assignments that will comprise your grade. I have listed all of these assignments below with a brief description. Throughout the semester, I will provide you with detailed assignment descriptions at the beginning of each project cycle; the more detailed descriptions will outline the project specifics in order to guide you more thoroughly. In addition to the descriptions, I've include points totals and page counts (drafts included) for each assignment.

Resume/Cover Letter (20 points, 4 pages): You will create a professional resume that meets the specifications of your particular field; likewise, you will compose a cover letter for a internship or an entry-level job opening for which you could conceivably (or will) apply.

Proposal (15 points, 6 pages): Another important aspect of working in the sciences is creating proposals for funding or pitching projects and research plans, etc. To this end, you will be asked to follow "real world" guidelines and styles for creating and presenting a proposals.

Annotated Bibliography (15 points, 8 pages):

"Radiolab" Audio Essay (25 points, 15 pages): Mainstream audiences and popular culture engage the sciences in a drastically different manner than professionals in a specific field. As burgeoning professionals in the sciences, how can you present your work and interests to those without an in-depth knowledge of your discourse? Radiolab, a popular science-based program on National Public Radio (NPR) has discovered an interesting and entertaining way to do so. For this assignment, then, you will be required to work as a group in order to create an audio essay one a topic that would be apropos for this program.

"TEDTalk" Video Essay (25 points, 15 pages): Another popular forum that brings science-related subject matter to the masses are TED Talks, sponsored by the organization TED. Unlike the Radiolab assignment, though, your TED Talk assignment will require you to work as a group in order to create a video talk/essay on a specific topic that would work within the current TED Talk model.

Grading:

A = 100-94A- = 93-90B+ = 89-87B = 86-84B- = 83-80C+ = 79-77
C = 76-74C- = 73-70D+ = 69-67D = 66-64D- = 63-60F = 59-0


Attendence:

You can choose not to come to five class sessions during the course of the semester with no affect to your grade. For each absence after your fifth, your final grade will be docked one letter grade. For example, if you miss four class sessions during the semester and your final grade is an A-, you will receive a B-. I understand that people get sick or have pressing needs that need to be attended to, so use your absences wisely. If you are absent and miss in-class work or fail to turn in an assignment, you will lose those points. Finally, it is your responsibility to find out what you missed from one of your peers (i.e. another student).

Late Assignments:

I do not accept late assignments. If, for some reason, a cataclysmic event occurs that does not enable you to turn in your assignment on time, you can ask for an extension. But the granting of an extension will only happen in extremely rare circumstances; likewise, the decision on whether or not I grant you an extension is dependent entirely upon my discretion and opinion. Such a decision is not up for debate or arbitration with a third-party. Basically, operate under the mindset that late assignments will not be accepted.

Writing Center:

If you want additional help with your writing, the Writing Center in Norlin Library is a great place to go to talk about ideas, improve your thesis or essay organization, or just generally work on your writing skills. Check the Writing Center website for more information about hours and services, or request an appointment online at:

http://www.colorado.edu/pwr/writingcenter.html



PROGRAM OF WRITING AND RHETORIC (PWR) GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:

In addition to my own goals and objectives, which I have stated above, the PWR has its own goals and objectives that it wants students to achieve in WRTG 3030. I have listed these requirements below so you are aware of these additional, program-level demands.

Critical Thinking and Its Written Application

As writers and readers, students will:

-See writing as a form of personal engagement, demanding an awareness of the inherent power of language and its ability to bring about change.
-Pose and shape a question at issue.
-Locate and use resources when necessary for exploring a line of inquiry.
-Critically evaluate information sources for credibility, validity, timeliness, and relevance.
-Draw inferences from a body of evidence.
-Distinguish description from analysis and argument.
-Distinguish flawed from sound reasoning, and be able to respond to and challenge claims.
-Recognize a thesis, and understand the organic relationship between thesis and support in an essay.
-As writers, structure and develop points of argument in a coherent order to build a case; as readers, recognize this structure and development within texts.
-Critique one’s own works in progress and those of others.
-Recognize that academic and public writing is dialogic, addresses an audience, and anticipates the thinking, the questions, and the possible objections of readers.

The Writing Process

As writers, students will:

-Understand writing as an ongoing process that requires multiple drafts and various strategies for developing, revising and editing texts.
-Understand that revision is informed by critical dialogue.
-See the critical analysis of others’ work as relevant to one’s own writing.

Rhetorical Situation

Students will:

-Exercise rhetorical skills: frame issues, define and defend theses, invent and arrange appeals, answer counterarguments, and contextualize conclusions.
-Value writing as a collaborative dialogue between authors and audiences, critics, and colleagues.
-Make decisions about form, argumentation, and style based on the expectations of different audiences.
-Recognize that a voice or style appropriate to one discipline or rhetorical context might be less appropriate for another.
-Develop "topic"-specific language that is appropriate for the defined audience while also intelligible to a non-expert audience.

Mechanics and Style

Students will:

-Convey meaning through concise, precise, highly readable language.
-Apply the basics of grammar, sentence-structure, and other mechanics integral to analytical and persuasive writing.
-Develop skills in proofreading.
-Use voice, style, and diction appropriate to the discipline or rhetorical context.
-Use paragraph structure and transitional devices to aid the reader in following even a complex train of thought.

This set of goals expresses the PWR’s commitment to preparing you for the kinds of reading and writing you will perform in your other classes. They also fulfill the course criteria given to all state institutions by the Colorado Commission on Higher Education, the governmental body that contributes to the policies for college education in Colorado. In other words, this writing class is not just about what your writing teacher here at CU thinks is important. It’s about deepening your skills in rhetorical knowledge, writing processes, and language conventions so that you can write effectively for a variety of audiences in a variety of situations—both inside and outside the classroom.



UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO-BOULDER RECOMMENDED SYLLABUS STATEMENTS:

Just as both the PWR and I have our own course policies, goals, and objectives, so too does the university. Below are several university statements and accompanying URLs that will direct you to additional information.

Disabilities:

If you qualify for accommodations because of a disability, please submit to me a letter from Disability Services in a timely manner so that your needs can be addressed. Disability Services determines accommodations based on documented disabilities. Contact: 303-492-8671, Center for Community N200, and http://www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices. If you have a temporary medical condition or injury, see the guidelines at http://www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices/go.cgi?select=temporary.html. Religious Observances* Campus policy regarding religious observances requires that faculty make every effort to deal reasonably and fairly with all students who, because of religious obligations, have conflicts with scheduled exams, assignments or required attendance. In this class, I ask that you contact me at least one week ahead of the date(s) that you will be absent so that we can discuss any assignments/class material that you will miss. See full details at:

http://www.colorado.edu/policies/fac_relig.html

Classroom Behavior:

Students and faculty each have responsibility for maintaining an appropriate learning environment. Those who fail to adhere to such behavioral standards may be subject to discipline. Professional courtesy and sensitivity are especially important with respect to individuals and topics dealing with differences of race, color, culture, religion, creed, politics, veteran's status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity and gender expression, age, disability, and nationalities. Class rosters are provided to the instructor with the student's legal name. I will gladly honor your request to address you by an alternate name or gender pronoun. Please advise me of this preference early in the semester so that I may make appropriate changes to my records. See policies at:

http://www.colorado.edu/policies/classbehavior.html

http://www.colorado.edu/studentaffairs/judicialaffairs/code.html#student_code

Discrimination and Harassment:

The University of Colorado at Boulder Discrimination and Harassment Policy and Procedures, the University of Colorado Sexual Harassment Policy and Procedures, and the University of Colorado Conflict of Interest in Cases of Amorous Relationships policy apply to all students, staff, and faculty. Any student, staff, or faculty member who believes s/he has been the subject of sexual harassment or discrimination or harassment based upon race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, creed, religion, sexual orientation, or veteran status should contact the Office of Discrimination and Harassment (ODH) at 303-492-2127 or the Office of Student Conduct (OSC) at 303-492-5550. Information about the ODH, the above referenced policies, and the campus resources available to assist individuals regarding discrimination or harassment can be obtained at:

http://www.colorado.edu/odh

Honor Code:

All students of the University of Colorado at Boulder are responsible for knowing and adhering to the academic integrity policy of this institution. Violations of this policy may include: cheating, plagiarism, aid of academic dishonesty, fabrication, lying, bribery, and threatening behavior. All incidents of academic misconduct shall be reported to the Honor Code Council (honor@colorado.edu; 303-735-2273). Students who are found to be in violation of the academic integrity policy will be subject to both academic sanctions from the faculty member and non-academic sanctions (including but not limited to university probation, suspension, or expulsion). Other information on the Honor Code can be found at:

http://www.colorado.edu/policies/honor.html

http://www.colorado.edu/academics/honorcode



COURSE SCHEDULE:

What follows is a tentative schedule for our class sessions this semester. Please prepare accordingly, but be aware that details are subject to change based upon how the semester proceeds.

Monday: 12 Jansyllabus and introductions
Wednesday: 14 Janintroductions (continued) and discussion
Friday: 16 Jandiscussion
Monday: 19 JanOFF MLK
Wednesday: 21 JanResume Discussion
Friday: 23 JanResume Workshop
Monday: 26 JanResume Workshop
Wednesday: 28 JanResume Peer-Review
Friday: 31 JanCover Letter Discussion / Resume Due
Monday: 02 FebCover Letter Workshop
Wednesday: 04 FebCANCELLED CLASS
Friday: 06 FebCover Letter Workshop
Monday: 09 FebCover Letter Peer-Review
Wednesday: 11 FebResearch Proposal Guidelines / Cover Letter Due
Friday: 13 FebStudent Presentations
Monday: 16 FebStudent Presentations
Wednesday: 18 FebStudent Presentations
Friday: 20 FebFirst Group Meeting
Monday: 23 FebSecond Group Meeting
Wednesday: 25 FebThird Group Meeting
Friday: 27 FebGroup Conferences
Monday: 02 MarGroup Conferences
Wednesday: 04 MarGroup Conferences
Friday: 06 MarResearch Proposal Due / Annotated Bibliography Guidelines
Monday: 09 MarTEDTalk Guidelines / video-editing tutorial
Wednesday: 11 MarMLA citation methods 
Friday: 13 Mar
Monday: 16 Mar
Wednesday: 18 Mar
Friday: 20 MarAnnotated Bibliography Due
Monday: 23 MarOFF Spring Break
Wednesday: 25 MarOFF Spring Break
Friday: 27 MarOFF Spring Break
Monday: 30 Mar
Wednesday: 01 Apr
Friday: 03 Apr
Monday: 06 AprTEDTalk Video Essays Due / RadioLab Guidlines
Wednesday: 08 Apr
Friday: 10 AprTBD
Monday: 13 AprTBD
Wednesday: 15 AprTBD
Friday: 17 Apr
Monday: 20 AprTBD
Wednesday: 22 AprTBD
Friday: 24 AprTBD
Monday: 27 AprTBD
Wednesday: 29 AprTBD
Friday: 01 MayRadioLab Podcase Due